A multi-model analysis of long-term emissions and the warming implications of current mitigation efforts

  • 1.

    The Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2020); https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

  • 2.

    Le Quéré, C. et al. CO drop factors2 emissions in 18 developed economies. Nat. Clim. Switch 9, 213-218 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 3.

    Roelfsema, M. et al. Take stock of national climate policies to assess the implementation of the Paris Agreement. Nat. Common. 11, 2096 (2020).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 4.

    Hausfather, Z. & Peters, GP Emissions — the “business as usual” story is misleading. Nature 577, 618-620 (2020).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 5.

    Grant, N., Hawkes, A., Napp, T. & Gambhir, A. Appropriate use of baseline scenarios in mitigation analysis. Nat. Clim. Switch ten, 605-610 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • 6.

    IPCC Special report on global warming of 1.5 ° C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (OMM, 2018).

  • 7.

    IPCC Climate change 2014: climate change mitigation (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  • 8.

    Robinson, JB Futures Under Glass: A Recipe For Those Who Hate To Predict. Futures contracts 22, 820-842 (1990).

  • 9.

    Kriegler, E. et al. Make or break climate objectives: the AMPERE study on phased accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Switch 90, 322-326 (2015).

    Google Scholar

  • ten.

    Eskander, SMSU & Fankhauser, S. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from National Climate Legislation. Nat. Clim. Switch ten, 750-756 (2020).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 11.

    Meckling, J. & Jenner, S. Varieties of market-based policies: choice of instruments in climate policy. About. Polit. 25, 853-874 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 12.

    Bataille, C., Guivarch, C., Hallegatte, S., Rogelj, J. & Waisman, H. Carbon prices in countries. Nat. Clim. Switch 8, 648-650 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 13.

    Jacoby, HD, Chen, Y.-HH & Flannery, BP Informing transparency in the Paris Agreement: the role of business models. Clim. Politics 17, 873-890 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 14.

    Aldy, J. et al. Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris Agreement. Nat. Clim. Switch 6, 1000–1004 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 15.

    Rogelj, J. et al. Understand the origin of the uncertainties on Paris Agreement emissions. Nat. Common. 8, 15748 (2017).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 16.

    Rogelj, J. et al. The Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 ° C. Nature 534, 631-639 (2016).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 17.

    Geiges, A. et al. Gradual improvements to the 2030 targets are insufficient to meet the Paris Agreement targets. Syst. of Dyna land. 11, 697-708 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • 18.

    Fawcett, AA et al. Can Paris promises prevent severe climate change? Science 350, 1168-1169 (2015).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 19.

    Fujimori, S. et al. Implication of the Paris Agreement in the context of long-term climate change mitigation goals. Springerplus 5, 1620 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 20.

    Vandyck, T., Keramidas, K., Saveyn, B., Kitous, A. & Vrontisi, Z. Global stocktake of the Paris commitments: implications for energy systems and the economy. Glob. About. Switch 41, 46-63 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 21.

    Vrontisi, Z. et al. Improving the ambition of global climate policy towards stabilization at 1.5 ° C: a short-term multi-model assessment. About. Res. Lett. 13, 044039 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 22.

    McCollum, DL et al. Energy investment needs to fulfill the Paris Agreement and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Energy 3, 589-599 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 23.

    Jeffery, ML, Gütschow, J., Rocha, MR & Gieseke, R. Measuring Success: Improving Assessments of Global Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets. The future of the earth 6, 1260-1274 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 24.

    2020 Emissions Gap Report (UNEP, 2020).

  • 25.

    Giarola, S. et al. Challenges of Harmonizing Global Integrated Assessment Models: A Comprehensive Methodology to Reduce Heterogeneity of Model Responses. Sci. About. 783, 146861 (2021).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 26.

    Krey, V. et al. Looking Under the Hood: A Comparison of Technical-Economic Assumptions Between National and Global Integrated Valuation Models. Energy 172, 1254-1267 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 27.

    Jaxa-Rozen, M. & Trutnevyte, E. Sources of Uncertainty in Long-Term Global Scenarios for Solar Photovoltaic Technology. Nat. Clim. Switch 11, 266-273 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • 28.

    den Elzen, M. et al. Are the G20 economies making enough progress to meet their NDC targets? Energy policy 126, 238-250 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 29.

    Dubash, NK, Khosla, R., Rao, ND & Bhardwaj, A. India’s Energy and Emissions Future: An Interpretive Analysis of Model Scenarios. About. Res. Lett. 13, 074018 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 30.

    Schaeffer, R. et al. Compare the transformation paths between the main economies. Climate change 162, 1787-1803 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • 31.

    Harmsen, M. et al. Diagnosis of the integrated evaluation model: key indicators and model evolution. About. Res. Lett. 16, 054046 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • 32.

    Kriegler, E. et al. Diagnostic indicators for integrated climate policy assessment models. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Switch 90, 45-61 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • 33.

    Keppo, I. et al. Exploring the Space of Possibilities: Taking stock of the various capacities and gaps in integrated assessment models. About. Res. Lett. 16, 053006 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • 34.

    Hoesly, RM et al. Historical anthropogenic emissions (1750-2014) of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Geosci. Dev. 11, 369-408 (2018).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 35.

    Nikas, A. et al. Perspective of a comprehensive and understandable multi-model science of energy and climate in Europe. Energy 215, 119153 (2021).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 36.

    Meinshausen, M. et al. Emulation of coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 1: Description and calibration of the model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417-1456 (2011).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 37.

    Matthews, HD et al. Opportunities and challenges of using remaining carbon budgets to guide climate policy. Nat. Geosci. 13, 769-779 (2020).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 38.

    Peters, GP The “best science available” to inform policy choices 1.5 ° C. Nat. Clim. Switch 6, 646-649 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 39.

    Riahi, K. et al. Shared socio-economic pathways and their implications for energy, land use and greenhouse gas emissions: an overview. Glob. About. Switch 42, 153-168 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 40.

    Sognnaes, I. et al. Sognnaes_et_al_2021_NCC_DATASET version 1.1. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/record/5562199 (2021).

  • About Chris McCarter

    Check Also

    YC Maikyau, the “hero of the Oputa panel” who intends to lead the bar

    Nigerian lawyers are gearing up across the country to elect the next president of the …